The meaning of climate change in American politics: an embedding regression analysis of U.S. politicians on Twitter
admin June 13, 2025

The meaning of climate change in American politics: an embedding regression analysis of U.S. politicians on Twitter

  • Abramowitz AI, Webster S (2016) The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of US elections in the 21st century. Elect Stud 41:12–22

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragones E, Neeman Z (2000) Strategic ambiguity in electoral competition. J Theor Polit 12(2):183–204

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers M, Marlon JR, Ballew MT, Maibach EW, Rosenthal SA, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A (2024) Changes in global warming’s six Americas: an analysis of repeat respondents. Clim Change 177(6):96

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist P, Warshaw C (2019) Does global warming increase public concern about climate change? The Journal of Politics 81(2):686–691

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop B, Cushing RG (2009) The big sort: why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

  • Blei DM, Ng A, Jordan M (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3:993–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley-Trujillo R, Poe J (2020) The importance of salience: public opinion and state policy action on climate change. J Publ Policy 40(2):280–304

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown AR, Hamilton LC (2021) Interaction effects on support for climate-change mitigation. Soc Sci Q 102(6):2649–2660

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brulle RJ (2010) Politics and the environment. In: Handbook of politics. Springer, New York, pp 385–406

  • Carmichael JT, Brulle RJ (2017) Elite cues, media coverage, and public concern: an integrated path analysis of public opinion on climate change, 2001–2013. Environ Polit 26(2):232–252

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg MI, Zhou Y, Gurney K, Kahn ME (2013) Carbon geography: the political economy of congressional support for legislation intended to mitigate greenhouse gas production. Econ Inq 51(2):1640–1650

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM, Yarosh JH (2016) The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the US. Environ: Sci Policy Sustain Dev 58(5):4–23

  • Eckert F, Gvirtz A, Liang J, Peters M (2020) A method to construct geographical crosswalks with an application to us counties since 1790 (No. w26770). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26770

  • Evans HK, Cordova V, Sipole S (2014) Twitter style: an analysis of how house candidates used Twitter in their 2012 campaigns. PS: Polit Sci Polit 47(2):454–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell J (2016) Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(1):92–97

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman L, Hart PS, Milosevic T (2017) Polarizing news? Representations of threat and efficacy in leading US newspapers’ coverage of climate change. Public Underst Sci 26(4):481–497

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer J, Roberts ME, Stewart BM (2022) Text as data: a new framework for machine learning and the social sciences. Princeton University Press

  • Gurney KR, Liang J, Patarasuk R, Song Y, Huang J, Roest G (2019) Vulcan: high-resolution annual fossil fuel CO2 emissions in USA, 2010-2015, Version 3. ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1741

  • Hamilton LC (2011) Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Clim Change 104(2):231–242

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LC, Cutler MJ, Schaefer A (2012) Public knowledge and concern about Polar-RegionWarming. Polar Geogr 35(2):155–168

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris ZS (1954) Distributional structure. Word 10(2–3):146–162

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang S, Kopp R, Jina A, Rising J, Delgado M, Mohan S,… Houser T (2017) Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science 356(6345):1362–1369

  • Karell D, Sachs J (2023) How symbols influence social media discourse: an embedding regression analysis of Trump’s return to twitter. Socius 9:23780231231212108

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodak M et al (2018) A la carte embedding: cheap but effective induction of semantic feature vectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.05388

  • Kozlowski AC, Taddy M, Evans JA (2019) The geometry of culture: Analyzing the meanings of class through word embeddings. Am Sociol Rev 84(5):905–949

  • Mah A, Song E (2024) Elite speech about climate change: analysis of sentiment from the United Nations Conference of Parties, 1995–2021. Sustainability 16(7):2779

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin GJ, Webster SW (2020) Does residential sorting explain geographic polarization? Polit Sci Res Methods 8(2):215–231

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM (2011) Political orientation moderates Americans’ beliefs and concern about climate change. Clim Change 104:243–253

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2003) Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement’s impact on US climate change policy. Soc Probl 50(3):348–373

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011a) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly 52:155–194

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011b) Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Glob Environ Chang 21:1163–1172

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks L (2023) Blue bird in a coal mine: how 2020 democratic presidential candidates framed climate change on Twitter. J Inform Tech Polit 20(2):169–183

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikolov T, Yih W-T, Zweig G (2013) Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. Proc NAACL-HLT 2013:746–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger M (2021) The development of climate institutions in the United States. Environ Polit 30(sup1):71–92

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger M, Leiserowitz A (2017) Public opinion on climate change: is there an economy–environment tradeoff? Environ Polit 26(5):801–824

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington J, Socher R, Manning CD (2014) Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pp 1532–1543

  • Quinn KM, Monroe BL, Colaresi M, Crespin MH, Radev DR (2010) How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs. Am J Polit Sci 54(1):209–228

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden J (2010) The geographic distribution of political preferences. Annu Rev Polit Sci 13:321–340

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez PL, Spirling A (2022) Word embeddings: what works, what doesn’t, and how to tell the difference for applied research. J Polit 84(1):101–115

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez PL, Spirling A, Stewart BM (2023) Embedding regression: models for context-specific description and inference. Am Polit Sci Rev 117(4):1255–1274

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell A (2021) Tweeting is leading: how senators communicate and represent in the age of Twitter. Oxford University Press

  • Sabherwal A, Ballew MT, van Der Linden S, Gustafson A, Goldberg MH, Maibach EW,… Leiserowitz A (2021) The greta thunberg effect: familiarity with Greta Thunberg predicts intentions to engage in climate activism in the United States. J Appl Soc Psychol 51(4):321–333

  • Shapiro MA, Hemphill L (2017) Politicians and the policy agenda: does use of twitter by the US congress direct New York times content? Policy Internet 9(1):109–132

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith EK, Mayer A (2019) Anomalous Anglophones? Contours of free market ideology, political polarization, and climate change attitudes in English-speaking countries, Western European and post-Communist states. Clim Change 152(1):17–34

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillman L (2016) Culture’s coherence: how the trees compose the woods. Am Sociol 47(4):416–429

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes LC (2016) Electoral backlash against climate policy: A natural experiment on retrospective voting and local resistance to public policy. Am J Polit Sci 60(4):958–974

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz DS, Taylor MA (2021) Cultural cartography with word embeddings. Poetics 88:101567

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber EU (2010) What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Clim Change 1(3):332–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood ML, Stoltz DS, Van Ness J, Taylor MA (2018) Schemas and frames. Sociol Theory 36(3):244–261

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynes S, Dickau M, Kotcher JE, Thaker J, Goldberg MH, Matthews HD, Donner SD (2022) Frequent pro-climate messaging does not predict pro-climate voting by United States legislators. Environ Res: Clim 1(2):025011

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Margolin DB, Fownes JR, Eiseman DL, Chatrchyan AM, Allred SB (2021) Tweeting about climate: Which politicians speak up and what do they speak up about? Soc Media+ Soc 7(3):20563051211033816

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zingher JN (2022) TRENDS: Diploma divide: Educational attainment and the realignment of the American electorate. Polit Res Q 75(2):263–277

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • CONTENT CREDIT

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *